Investors Give Albanese Government a Thumbs Down: Insights from Our Subscriber Poll

This entire post was created by ChatGPT, Grok and Gemini using the data and comments from the poll.

In our recent poll of the Wholesale Investor subscriber base, we asked, “How do you feel the Albanese Government is performing?” The responses indicated overwhelming disapproval of the government’s performance.”

A staggering 60.27% of respondents rated the government’s leadership as “Terrible – A complete failure,” with only 1.37% viewing their performance as “Excellent.”

Please note: This article presents poll results. The methodology and full results are located at the end of the article. The entire process, from creation to analysis, was conducted by large language models (LLMs). Neither the poll nor the article included opinions from Wholesale Investor.

The same approach was used to gather our subscribers’ thoughts on the US elections, which you can access here. 

Detailed Performance Breakdown

Innovation: While still negative, with 28.77% rating it as terrible, the government’s approach received the most balanced feedback, with 45.21% rating it as poor, suggesting some acknowledgment of efforts, albeit insufficient.

Cost of Living: A vast 78.08% of respondents rated the government’s handling of daily expenses as terrible, with no one giving an excellent rating.

Housing: With 79.45% marking it as terrible, the government’s approach to housing affordability, immigration impact, and property investment policies was heavily criticised.

Economic Management: Over two-thirds (69.86%) see economic management as a failure, highlighting concerns over fiscal policy and growth strategies.

Immigration: An even higher percentage, 82.19%, view immigration policies negatively, with worries about local resources, jobs, and housing.

Climate Change & Energy Policy: While still largely negative, with 45.21% and 47.95% rating these areas as terrible, there’s a slightly less pessimistic view here, with some respondents acknowledging efforts in climate change and energy policy, though not without significant criticism regarding the shift to renewables.

Health and Social Care: 65.75% of the respondents see this sector as poorly managed, with comments focusing on funding and care quality.

Crime and Social Order: With 73.97% rating this area as terrible, there’s clear concern over rising crime and social order issues.

Political Integrity and Transparency: Nearly three-quarters (72.60%) believe the government lacks transparency and integrity, fuelling distrust in political processes.

Freedom of Speech: Half of the respondents (50.68%) are concerned about government policies impacting free speech and privacy.

Deregulation: A significant 61.64% feel that regulations are stifling business growth rather than enhancing it.

Innovation: While still negative, with 28.77% rating it as terrible, the government’s approach to innovation received the most balanced feedback, with 45.21% rating it as poor, suggesting some acknowledgment of efforts, albeit insufficient.

Investor Voices: Direct Quotes on the Albanese Government

1. In your own words, how do you feel the Albanese government has been performing?

1. “They have spent the whole time seeking the politics of envy and conflict.”
2. “Woeful, in all aspects of its government.”
3. “The most incompetent and naive government we have ever had.”
4. “Worst government ever.”
5. “They have turned the country back to the 1970s.”
6. “Leadership in all areas is missing.”
7. “Ineffective, every major policy decision has been a failure.”
8. “Disgraceful, no policy, very reactive to events.”
9. “The worst government I have experienced in my 75 years.”
10. “Absolutely shocking. One broken promise after another.”

2. How do you perceive the Albanese government’s support and policies for driving innovation in Australia?

1. “The government’s approach has hindered innovation and economic growth.”
2. “Innovation has been overlooked, with insufficient incentives for startups and small businesses.”
3. “You can’t do anything.”
4. “Poor – Innovation has been overlooked, with insufficient tax incentives for investors.”
5. “Bring back everything from overseas.”
6. “Stop meddling. Leave private enterprise alone.”
7. “Get rid of red tape and taxes.”
8. “Time to quit the political games.”
9. “They should prioritise small businesses.”
10. “Just removing obstacles would be a start.”

3. In your opinion, what should the Albanese government prioritise to foster greater innovation? Share any specific areas or initiatives you think need urgent attention.

1. “There is no middle ground. Time for a total reset.”
2. “More financial support for businesses.”
3. “Tax reform, incentives for investment.”
4. “Ditch global warming initiatives.”
5. “Stop industry super funds from using member funds for political purposes.”
6. “Nuclear power is the only way forward.”
7. “Strategic importance of backing national interest.”
8. “Reforms to superannuation.”
9. “Downsize the ‘public service’.”
10. “Land taxes to be kept at a reasonable rate not increased.”

4. Why did you rank these issues in this order?

1. “These are the issues that affect me and my family.”
2. “They are fundamental to a prosperous and secure future for Australia.”
3. “Without addressing these, everything else is secondary.”
4. “They are the most pressing challenges facing the nation.”
5. “They have the biggest impact on people’s daily lives.”
6. “They are essential for a strong and stable society.”
7. “They determine the overall direction of the country.”
8. “They are the foundation of a well-functioning economy.”
9. “They are critical for maintaining our standard of living.”
10. “They reflect my values and priorities for the country.”

5. What specific changes or policies would you like to see in the areas you ranked as most important?

1. “Cut red tape and reduce taxes for businesses.”
2. “Invest in infrastructure and create more jobs.”
3. “Reform the immigration system to prioritise skilled workers.”
4. “Increase funding for healthcare and education.”
5. “Take stronger action on climate change and energy.”
6. “Address the housing affordability crisis.”
7. “Strengthen law enforcement and reduce crime.”
8. “Promote policies that support families and communities.”
9. “Ensure greater accountability and transparency in government.”
10. “Protect freedom of speech and individual liberties.”

6. Are there any recent events or social media discussions that have swayed your opinion on these topics?

1. “The rising cost of living has made me more concerned about the economy.”
2. “Recent crime incidents have increased my focus on law and order.”
3. “The debate on immigration has influenced my views on border control.”
4. “Discussions on social media have highlighted the importance of free speech.”
5. “News reports on government spending have made me more aware of fiscal responsibility.”
6. “The energy crisis has emphasised the need for a reliable energy policy.”
7. “The housing market has made me more concerned about affordability.”
8. “International events have shaped my views on foreign policy and defence.”
9. “Social media discussions on healthcare have influenced my opinion on the need for reform.”
10. “Recent political scandals have increased my concerns about political integrity.”

Conclusion

The survey paints a picture of an investor community deeply dissatisfied with the current government’s approach to key issues. The call for change is loud, with a focus on economic recovery, innovation support, and a return to policies that prioritise growth and security. As we move forward, the Albanese government faces significant challenges in regaining trust and confidence from this influential demographic, whose economic decisions could shape Australia’s future trajectory.

Poll Results

Performance Rating	Percentage of Respondents
Terrible – A complete failure in leadership	60.27%
Poor – They’ve been underperforming	21.92%
Average – Mixed results	9.59%
Good – A positive performance	6.85%
Excellent – They’ve been delivering on promises	1.37%

Breakdown by Specific Areas (All 5 Ratings as %):

Area	Terrible	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Cost of Living	78.08%	12.33%	5.48%	4.11%	0.00%
Housing	79.45%	10.96%	5.48%	2.74%	1.37%
Economic Management	69.86%	13.70%	9.59%	5.48%	1.37%
Immigration	82.19%	5.48%	6.85%	4.11%	1.37%
Climate Change	45.21%	12.33%	21.92%	16.44%	4.11%
Energy Policy	47.95%	13.70%	19.18%	15.07%	4.11%
Health and Social Care	65.75%	12.33%	12.33%	8.22%	1.37%
Crime and Social Order	73.97%	10.96%	8.22%	5.48%	1.37%
Political Integrity	72.60%	10.96%	9.59%	5.48%	1.37%
Freedom of Speech	50.68%	13.70%	23.29%	9.59%	2.74%
Deregulation	61.64%	16.44%	12.33%	6.85%	2.74%
Innovation	28.77%	45.21%	16.44%	8.22%	1.37%

Survey Methodology Note

The survey on the performance of the Albanese Government was conducted with high-net-worth individuals and family office investors. Below is an outline of the methodology used to design, analyse, and report the survey:

1. Question Creation
   
   • The survey questions were developed using Grok, leveraging its advanced analysis of trending concerns and topics expressed by users on X (formerly Twitter). This ensured that the questions reflected real-time sentiment and key policy areas of interest.
   • Additional questions focusing on innovation and economic growth were created using ChatGPT, providing a more comprehensive exploration of the government’s approach to fostering innovation.
     
2. Data Analysis
   
   • The responses were analysed using Google AI Studio with the Gemini 1206 model (experimental), which provided insights into the data. This model identified trends, broke down respondent sentiments, and ensured accuracy in the interpretation of the results.
     
3. Article Creation
   
   • The final article was crafted through a collaborative process using Grok to structure the narrative and identify critical themes. ChatGPT was utilised to refine the tone and language, ensuring the content was professional, personal, and aligned with the preferences of the target audience.

This combined approach of leveraging AI tools ensured that the survey and its reporting were reflective of investor sentiment.